Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6). The LSNS-6 is a validated instrument designed to gauge social isolation in older adults by measuring the number and . The Lubben Social Network Scale–6 (LSNS-6) is a six-item, self-reported scale to assess social isolation in older adults (aged 65 years old and. Description, The Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS) is a item instrument that was designed to measure social isolation in older adults by measuring.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||9 January 2009|
|PDF File Size:||9.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.59 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
These LSNS-6 measures are also highly correlated with many measures of physical and mental health. In the present study we appraise the performance of this abbreviated version as a social health screener among three European community-dwelling populations.
Again, this concern is tempered by data from another earlier study. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
How many relatives do you feel at ease with that you can talk about private matters? Citing articles via Web of Science Much as community health nurses are now being urged to screen clients for social isolation Tremethick,it appears that other gerontological professionals should consider adopting similar practice protocols.
The LSNS-6 is constructed from a set of three questions that evaluate kinship ties and a comparable set of three questions that evaluate nonkin ties. A copy of the LSNS-6 including response options is found in the appendix.
Table 4 examines the discriminant validity of the LSNS-6, the LSNS-6 Family subscale, and the LSNS-6 Friend subscale by comparing means of individuals living with a partner or living alone, participating or not in group activities, and having marginal emotional support or low, moderate, or high emotional support.
Sign In or Create an Account. Similarly, a cut-point score of less than 6 on the three-item Family subscale would indicate that, on average, the respondent would have fewer than two family members to perform those functions. In Hamburg, participants were recruited from both urban and suburban soclal with a relatively large proportion of netwrk with higher educational levels. Based on the concept of lack of redundancy of social ties we defined clinical cut-points of the LSNS-6 for identifying persons deemed at risk for social isolation.
Related articles in Web of Science Google Scholar. Our central focus in this study was to assess a recently reported abbreviated social network scale. However, there are no known sources of normative data drawn from population surveys regarding social isolation among general community-dwelling older adults.
The first case is an older person with the same number of people available for each of the components of the luvben and friendship network. Finally, we used statistical methods for determining whether using an alternate cut point would have given better results. Scale development and validation are cumulative and ongoing processes.
The total scale score is an equally weighted sum of the six items, with scores ranging from 0 to Except for vision and emotional support, significant differences were noted among the samples.
Lubben Social Network Scale | ISCMR
Therefore, using the higher cut point would result in a situation in which too large a group of individuals would be deemed at risk and thus be candidates for more extensive assessment and consideration for possible clinical interventions. We evaluated lubbej consistency by using Cronbach’s alpha.
These data show that some information is lost as a result of the dichotomization of the scores. Social Assessment Tool Category: It has been associated with a wide array of health indicators.
Lubben Social Network Scale
These three items are repeated with respect to nonkin ties by replacing the word relatives with the word friends. Screening older persons based on the LSNS-6 provides quantitative information on their family and friendship ties, and identifies persons at increased risk for social isolation who might benefit from in-depth assessment and targeted interventions. We determined the correlation based on the Pearson correlation coefficient between the presence of social isolation according to the new cut point, and two variables measuring social support i.
The Hamburg respondents were also more apt to report deficiencies in various aspects of their social support networks than their counterparts in Solothurn and London.
The response options for all three of these items are on a Likert scale ranging from never to always. Additional data socisl also were highly supportive of its discriminant validity. We retained those factors with an eigenvalue greater than 1, and we determined the factor structure by factor loadings having an absolute value greater than 0.
Lubben Social Network Scale–Revised (LSNS-R)
LSNS is available for free at http: As we expected, the dichotomous versions have a somewhat lower level of correlations with the selected social and health indicators.
Central to this research will be measurement development. We used two criteria for validation. As previously described, the basic logic behind these suggested cut points was to identify respondents who appeared to be overly reliant on one person or perhaps even lacked this minimal level of support. A limitation of the present study is that a gold standard for social isolation has yet to be developed.