Oct. Giannoulias vs. Kirk, roundtable - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News
The meaning was that Wooten might write fewer hardnews stories and more with a sociological bent, which sometimes require more thought and introspection. Cheney appeared on NBC's Meet the Press in September , Tim Russert. DSM when confronted by a guest, actor and activist Tim Robbins on the May 25 edi- fully relegated the significance of the memo to that of a “sideshow,” Sanger Yet Russert's Meet the Press reference was the first mention of the .. reporters and news practices, followed by a short period of journalistic introspection). Tim Russert poses for a portrait after a live taping of his show, "Meet the Press," on February 10, in bestwebdirectory.infon Smialowski.
My opponent wants to take that right away, called the Card Check bill. Giannoulias, how do you answer the question, job creation? I think one of the problem, I think one of the problems, quite frankly, is we have typical Washington, D. Congressman Kirk has been in Washington, D. I think what we have to do My question is, what do you do to create private sector jobs, to put people back to work? We need to focus on green jobs: But other countries like China are getting ahead of the curve.
The government did do a lot with the stimulus, right? You had actually said the stimulus was not big enough. Will you push the administration, if elected, to enact more stimulus, to spend more money to try to get more people back to work? I will tell you that we also have to keep in mind what the Recovery Act really did. I mean, 14 months of unemployment. They said that it would—if you passed stimulus, it would—the unemployment would get to 8 point percent; 9.
But if, if you take a look at what would have happened, I mean, do we need to see soup lines down the street to figure out what would have happened?
We avoided—and all economists will tell you that millions of jobs were saved because of the Recovery Act, and we avoided a second Great Depression.
That, that is a reality. All right, let me have you two engage on the big tax debate here. Congressman, do you think that the Bush-era tax cuts should be extended for all Americans? Like CNN just did a survey of economists If you look what congressional leaders want to do, they want to hit the U. If you look at the job numbers just last week, we have a significant danger of that.
Well, back in you were part of this Republican Main Street Partnership. And as part of that group, you had a press release on Now, here was a key part of that: Congressman, how can we afford to make permanent tax extensions now with the Bush tax cuts in this climate? Because especially in this climate we have congressional leaders that are not interested in spending restraint at all. For example, I back spending restraint across the board; at the DOD, like no second engine for the F fighter, closing down Joint Forces Command, across-the-board reductions.
When you look at the state of the economy right now, you have to set a priority. And my top priority is the deficit of jobs and economic growth, and especially this perception that the United States could be falling behind especially Asian economies. If we go through all the tax increases that congressional leaders propose—and by the way, Congress is going to come back right after the election in this lame duck session of Congress with a new round of spending in a omnibus appropriation bill, and new tax increases.
But the question, but the question, Mr. Giannoulias, should tax cuts be paid for? And this, this is why this race is so important. This is a fundamental public policy difference between myself and Congressman Kirk.
Look, the congressman has told some real whoppers during this campaign, but that may be the biggest one of all. He voted for every single one of the Bush budgets, which doubled our national debt. He voted to increase his own pay six times. He voted for the bridge to nowhere twice. He voted to raise the debt ceiling four times. The list goes on and on.
Well, Congressman, respond to that. Where are they going to get the money? For example, the president has been rumored to be bringing forward a line item veto proposal. Republicans should support that. We should have a new Grace Commission put forward with base closing powers to put a joint bill to House and Senate with just one up or down vote.
Racism in the NBA and on the ranch; Mariel Hemingway's public pain
In front of the Chicago Tribune, they asked him, name one spending bill that you would actually vote to cut. And as the Chicago Tribune said, when they endorsed me, it was painful to watch. To answer your question, and this is an area where I think the congressman and I would agree, I would have voted against the omnibus spending bill which included thousands of earmarks, a lot of pork. And, and quite frankly, this is where the president made a mistake.
He should have, he should have vetoed it. Most of the spending is an explosion of entitlement spending—Social Security, Medicare and, and the like.
What would you do on some of these big runaway programs? Social Security, would you look at upping the retirement age in order to basically cut benefits and save some of that money? I am personally not in favor of, of increasing the age limit. I do think we do need to look at, on the revenue side, different options, maybe increasing the taxable wage base, finding ways to get more revenue.
Do you stand with him in those cuts? I—first of all, we have a whole—we need a whole range of cuts. But no, my question is do you stand with him in some of his suggested cuts to Medicare? I, I, I have my own cuts which I want to put forward.
We should consolidate depot maintenance at the Department of Defense. Do you go beyond the Republican pledge, which is to go back to discretionary spending levels?
All posts tagged "politics"
I think we need a radical reduction in spending because we have The American way is a limited government and lower taxes, and a very robust small business sector, which is especially employing low-income and minority kids coming into the American dream. One more policy issue, quickly, between you: Congressman, you have said that you would lead the charge to repeal healthcare reform as passed by this Congress.
Is that still your position? It was not allowed for a debate or even discussion or a vote. But it did three big things. Second, lawsuit reform, which was completely skipped and needs to be in there.
Tim Russert - Wikipedia
And third, Congress should defend your right to buy health insurance from any state in the union if you find a plan less expensive to cover your family.
Giannoulias, what is your—are you running on healthcare reform? Is that something that you will stand by as passed by the Congress? And look, the healthcare bill was far from a perfect vehicle. That being said, I think it did some important things that the congressman wants to repeal: The truth is, you know, a lot of Medicare expenditures are fraud, waste and abuse, and what this does is create efficiencies within Medicare, which is why the AARP and the AMA endorsed it.
I would have loved to have seen a, a provision there to let the secretary of Health and Human Services negotiate bulk drug rates for Medicare the way that the VA does. So again, there was some missed opportunities in the implementation of healthcare I would just say, by the way, coverage of pre-existing conditions was in our bill. The difference, the difference is he wants to repeal it, I want to reform it and fix it and make sure that it works for small businesses and for families.
Let me move on to some of the personal aspects of this race. Who do you consider more trustworthy or honest?
Thirty-five, Giannoulias; 30 percent, Kirk; 16 percent, neither. I, I want to go through some of the issues that have cropped up on both sides and allow you guys to, to talk through it. Giannoulias, let me start with you. Back in you were running for state treasurer. This was part of an ad that you put on the air touting your record. Clip from campaign ad Advertise MR. Financial expert, businessman, banker. Your family bank, the Broadway Bank, was seized by regulators.
You released a statement earlier this year creating some distance from the bank and when it was closed. And let me put the statement on the screen. At the time I left, according to every independent analysis, the bank was one of the best performing in Illinois.
The issue highlights the fine line Giannoulias walks on the campaign trail in explaining exactly what he did at Broadway and when he did it. But by reporting that he worked at least hours at Broadway inGiannoulias was able to get a break that helped him avoid paying federal income tax in Paid million dollar—millions of dollars in taxes over the last five years.
But this is not what people are talking about, David. And when I—when you bring up the bank, you know, my father came to this country as an immigrant.
He started a community bank 30 years ago. This was not some fly-by-night company. It was his whole life, it was his whole legacy.
Another almost thousand community banks are on the watch list. And you know what? Why did you say that you left in but you still told the IRS that you were there working in in order to get the tax break? David, nothing I said has been inconsistent. I said I left day-to-day operations in And I fully left the bank But you did work there in ?
Russert testified again in the trial on February 7, If I want to use anything from that conversation, then I will ask permission. Times wrote that, "Like former New York Times reporter Judith Miller, Russert was one of the high-level Washington journalists who came out of the Libby trial looking worse than shabby.
All the litigation was for the sake of image and because the journalistic conventions required it. It's our best format. I don't think the public was, at that time, particularly receptive to hearing it," Russert says. Those in favor were so dominant. We don't make up the facts. We cover the facts as they were. Folkenflik went on to write: Russert's remarks would suggest a form of journalism that does not raise the insolent question from outside polite political discourse—so, if an administration's political foes aren't making an opposing case, it's unlikely to get made.
In the words of one of my former editors, journalists can read the polls just like anybody else. My concern was, is that there were concerns expressed by other government officials. And to this day, I wish my phone had rung, or I had access to them. In Octoberliberal commentators accused Russert of harassing Clinton over the issue of supporting drivers' licenses for illegal immigrants.
Russert held season tickets to both the Washington Nationals and the Washington Wizards  and was elected to the board of directors of the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York in A lifelong fan of the Buffalo Bills football team, Russert often closed Sunday broadcasts during the football season with a statement of encouragement for the franchise.
The team released a statement on the day of his death, saying that listening to Russert's "Go Bills" exhortation was part of their Sunday morning game preparation.
While his son was attending Boston Collegehe often ended Meet the Press with a mention of the success of various Boston College sports teams. Russert's father Timothy Joseph Russert, "Big Russ", was a World War II veteran who held down two jobs after the war, emphasized the importance of maintaining strong family valuesthe reverence of faithand never taking a short cut to reach a goal. Russert claimed to have received over 60, letters from people in response to the book, detailing their own experiences with their fathers.
Lessons and Letters from Daughters and Sons ina collection of some of these letters. This book also became a best-seller.